Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Fix interop with cjs-module-lexer #2377

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

benasher44
Copy link

@benasher44 benasher44 commented Feb 28, 2024

This moves the main validator exports to validator-main.js (avoid conflict with top-level validator.js when running build), which then allows both a default and named exports in the index by re-exporting. By doing this, we get a CJS validator that also can be name-imported in node ESM.

Checklist

  • PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)
  • References provided in PR (where applicable)

@benasher44
Copy link
Author

Well I got pretty far just with this small change, but now I can't figure out how to get the AMD test to pass… any pointers there?

@benasher44
Copy link
Author

I also tried without adding a file to re-export from + just copy pasting all of the exports in the default export as named exports, but that has the same issue (seemingly) breaking AMD.

@WikiRik
Copy link
Member

WikiRik commented Mar 1, 2024

When building babel does give a warning;

Using named and default exports together. Consumers of your bundle will have to use validator['default'] to access the default export, which may not be what you want. Use `exports: 'named'` to disable this warning

That's also what seems to be changed in the built files. Apart from the expected additional exports it also returned validator before but now that's part of exports['default']. Unfortunately I have no experience with AMD to help out further

@benasher44
Copy link
Author

No problem. Thanks anyway! Yeah that's what I discovered as well. I did all kinds of inspection there and couldn't figure out a different way to get to the original module object shape it was expecting before :(

@WikiRik
Copy link
Member

WikiRik commented Mar 1, 2024

Might just be a Babel thing. I know there is an outdated PR from one of the maintainers that tried to overhaul the config (also because we're on old versions of Babel and Rollup); #1869

Maybe a smaller version of that is the way to go, but merging PRs is often quite slow with the current maintainers, see #2376

@benasher44
Copy link
Author

It could be, but in my local build, I tried with the latest version of Babel 8, which didn't change anything.

@profnandaa
Copy link
Member

I'll take a look at this while on my dev machine. But this is not a disruptive change like what I've seen in the past. Happy to see this land once all t's are crossed.

@benasher44
Copy link
Author

@profnandaa any chance you'll have time to look soon?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants